Chain.jl

Even more convenient than pipes.

Chain.jlBase JuliaPipe.jl
@chain df begin
  filter(:id => >(6), _)
  groupby(:group)
  combine(:age => sum)
end
df |>
  x -> filter(:id => >(6), x) |>
  x -> groupby(x, :group) |>
  x -> combine(x, :age => sum)
@pipe df |>
  filter(:id => >(6), _)|>
  groupby(_, :group) |>
  combine(_, :age => sum)

Build Status

Run tests

Summary

Chain.jl defines the @chain macro. It takes a start value and a begin ... end block of expressions.

The result of each expression is fed into the next one using one of two rules:

  1. There is at least one underscore in the expression
  • every _ is replaced with the result of the previous expression
  1. There is no underscore
  • the result of the previous expression is used as the first argument in the current expression, as long as it is a function call, a macro call or a symbol representing a function.

Lines that are prefaced with @aside are executed, but their result is not fed into the next pipeline step. This is very useful to inspect pipeline state during debugging, for example.

Motivation

  • The implicit first argument insertion is useful for many data pipeline scenarios, like groupby, transform and combine in DataFrames.jl
  • The _ syntax is there to either increase legibility or to use functions like filter or map which need the previous result as the second argument
  • There is no need to type |> over and over
  • Any line can be commented out or in without breaking syntax, there is no problem with dangling |> symbols
  • The state of the pipeline can easily be checked with the @aside macro
  • The begin ... end block marks very clearly where the macro is applied and works well with auto-indentation
  • Because everything is just lines with separate expressions and not one huge function call, IDEs can show exactly in which line errors happened

Example

An example with a DataFrame:

using DataFrames, Chain

df = DataFrame(group = [1, 2, 1, 2], weight = [1, 3, 5, 7])

result = @chain df begin
    filter(r -> r.weight < 6, _)
    groupby(:group)
    combine(:weight => sum => :total_weight)
end

The pipeless block is equivalent to this:

result = let
    var1 = filter(r -> r.weight < 6, df)
    var2 = groupby(var1, :group)
    var3 = combine(var2, :weight => sum => :total_weight)
end

Alternative one-argument syntax

If your initial argument name is long and / or the chain's result is assigned to a long variable, it can look cleaner if the initial value is moved into the chain. Here is such a long expression:

a_long_result_variable_name = @chain a_long_input_variable_name begin
    do_something
	do_something_else(parameter)
    do_other_thing(parameter, _)
end

This is equivalent to the following expression:

a_long_result_variable_name = @chain begin
    a_long_input_variable_name
    do_something
	do_something_else(parameter)
    do_other_thing(parameter, _)
end

The @aside macro

For debugging, it's often useful to look at values in the middle of a pipeline. You can use the @aside macro to mark expressions that should not pass on their result. For these expressions there is no implicit first argument spliced in if there is no _, because that would be impractical for most purposes.

If for example, we wanted to know how many groups were created after step 2, we could do this:

result = @chain df begin
    filter(r -> r.weight < 6, _)
    groupby(:group)
    @aside println("There are $(length(_)) groups after step 2.")
    combine(:weight => sum => :total_weight)
end

Which is again equivalent to this:

result = let
    var1 = filter(r -> r.weight < 6, df)
    var2 = groupby(var1, :group)
    println("There are $(length(var2)) groups after step 2.")
    var3 = combine(var2, :weight => sum => :total_weight)
end

Nested Chains

The @chain macro replaces all underscores in the following block, unless it encounters another @chain macrocall. In that case, the only underscore that is still replaced by the outer macro is the first argument of the inner @chain. You can use this, for example, in combination with the @aside macro if you need to process a side result further.

@chain df begin
    filter(r -> r.weight < 6, _)
    @aside @chain _ begin
            select(:group)
            CSV.write("filtered_groups.csv", _)
        end
    groupby(:group)
    combine(:weight => sum => :total_weight)
end

Rewriting Rules

Here is a list of equivalent expressions, where _ is replaced by prev and the new variable is next. In reality, each new variable simply gets a new name via gensym, which is guaranteed not to conflict with anything else.

BeforeAfterComment
sumnext = sum(prev)Symbol gets expanded into function call
sum(_)next = sum(prev)Call expression gets _ replaced
_ + 3next = prev + 3Infix call expressions work the same way as other calls
+(3)next = prev + 3Infix notation with _ would look better, but this is also possible
1 + 2next = prev + 1 + 2This might feel weird, but 1 + 2 is a normal call expression
filter(isodd, _)next = filter(isodd, prev)Underscore can go anywhere
@aside println(_)println(prev)println without affecting the pipeline; using _
@aside println("hello")println("hello")println without affecting the pipeline; no implicit first arg
@. sinnext = sin.(prev)Special-cased alternative to sin.(_)
@somemacronext = @somemacro(prev)Macro calls without arguments get an argument spliced in
@somemacro(x)next = @somemacro(prev, x)First argument splicing is the same as with functions
@somemacro(x, _)next = @somemacro(x, prev)Also underscore behavior